Competitive equilibrium as a bargaining solution: an axiomatic approach∗

نویسندگان

  • Shiri Alon
  • Ehud Lehrer
چکیده

The paper introduces an axiomatic characterization of a solution to bargaining problems. The bargaining problems addressed are specified by: (a) the preference relations of the bargaining parties (b) resources that are the subject of bargaining, and (c) a pre-specified disagreement bundle for each party that would result in case bargaining fails. The approach is ordinal in that parties’ preferences are over bundles of goods and do not imply any risk attitudes. The resulting solution is accordingly independent of the specific utility indices chosen to represent parties’ preferences. We propose axioms that characterize a solution that matches each bargaining problem with an exchange economy whose parameters are derived from the problem, and assigns the set of equilibrium allocations corresponding to one equilibrium price vector of that economy. The axioms describe a solution that is the result of an impartial arbitration process, expressing the view that arbitration is a natural method to settle disputes in which agents have conflicting interests, but can all gain from

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Vehicle Routing Problem in Competitive Environment: Two-Person Nonzero Sum Game Approach

Vehicle routing problem is one of the most important issues in transportation. Among VRP problems, the competitive VRP is more important because there is a tough competition between distributors and retailers. In this study we introduced new method for VRP in competitive environment. In these methods Two-Person Nonzero Sum games are defined to choose equilibrium solution. Therefore, revenue giv...

متن کامل

The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling

This article establishes the relationship between the static axiomatic theory of bargaining and the sequential strategic approach to bargaining. We consider two strategic models of alternating offers. The models differ in the source of the incentive of the bargaining parties to reach agreement: the bargainers' time preference and the risk of breakdown of negotiation. Each of the models has a un...

متن کامل

Bargaining and Destructive Power

The theory of bargaining as formulated by Nash (1950, 1953) has developed along two routes. One is axiomatic (e.g., Nash 1950; Kalai and Smorodinsky 1975; Roemer 1988). Here, the negotiation process underlying the bargaining is only implicit. The idea is to try to characterize the negotiated outcome (the solution) through a set of axioms without formally modeling the process. The advantages of ...

متن کامل

Cooperation in Strategic Games Revisited∗

For two-person complete-information strategic games with transferable utility, all major variable-threat bargaining and arbitration solutions coincide. This confluence of solutions by luminaries such as Nash, Harsanyi, Raiffa, and Selten, is more than mere coincidence. Staying in the class of two-person games with transferable unility, the present paper presents a more complete theory that expa...

متن کامل

Sustainable Solutions for Dynamic Bargaining Problems

By refering to the Bargaining Problem the economic literature means a situation in which a group of individuals seek to reach an agreement on a partition of a pie. Following Nash (1950) the two players bargaining problem is described using only two components (S, d) when d is a point in the plane which can be interpreted as the outcome when no agreement is reached and S is a compact convex subs...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016